In this article
Key takeaways
- A closed month can contain valid unpaid invoices.
- Record review, export, import and filing separately.
- New evidence needs an assessment of its effect on the books.
Five questions that need separate answers
| Question | What the answer establishes | What it does not establish |
|---|---|---|
| Is the bookkeeping period closed? | The month has completed the applicable close process | Every invoice has been paid |
| Is the current review complete? | The relevant version of the books has been examined | A later change has also been reviewed |
| Has an export been generated? | A particular package exists | The receiving software accepted it |
| Has that package been imported and checked? | The receiving ledger contains the intended data | A tax return has been submitted |
| Has the required return been submitted? | The filing process reached its own completion point | Every other obligation for the month is finished |
In DeinHans, the bookkeeping period has an open or closed state. Review runs and export results are separate. “Locked” is used differently by other accounting systems; do not assume an additional DeinHans period state or a particular permission from that word.
A closed month can contain unpaid invoices
Consider this simplified accrual-accounting example, excluding VAT:
- A supplier completes a repair on 25 September and issues an invoice for €900.
- The invoice is recorded in September: repair expense €900, supplier liability €900.
- The firm closes September on 5 October. The invoice is due on 15 October.
- The company pays €900 on 15 October.
At the September close, the €900 liability is correct. Its existence does not make the month unfinished. October records the payment against the supplier account and clears the liability; the September expense is not booked again.
| Position | At 30 September | After the October payment |
|---|---|---|
| September repair expense | €900 | €900 |
| Amount owed to this supplier | €900 | €0 |
| October payment | — | €900 |
The same distinction applies to a valid customer receivable or a documented platform reserve. The question is whether the balance is correct and explained. The open-items guide explains how to distinguish valid balances from missing allocations.
Agree what must be finished before close
For a small firm, a workable close definition covers four areas:
- Sources: the expected bank accounts, document channels and other records are covered for the month.
- Balances: bank, customer, supplier and clearing balances reconcile to their evidence.
- Exceptions: unresolved facts that affect the books have been addressed; legitimate outstanding balances have an explanation and follow-up.
- Review: the responsible person has completed the checks required for this client and the current data.
A future payment is ordinary follow-up. An unexplained difference in the bank balance is unfinished bookkeeping. A missing fact that could change VAT treatment requires a decision before the affected work is treated as complete.
Use the month-close checklist for the evidence behind these four areas.
Make the handover specific
A short handover can say:
September books closed on 5 October. Supplier invoice R-77: €900 outstanding, due 15 October. Export package September-v1 generated on 5 October. Target-system import and VAT filing remain with the assigned preparer.
This gives the next person an action and a known starting point. “September done” does not.
Where the engagement requires the target-system checks before final sign-off, record those checks before marking the handover complete. The firm's process determines the sequence; the existence of a CSV does not.
What happens when new evidence arrives?
First identify whether it changes a closed period or records a new event. An October payment of a correctly recorded September invoice is an October event. A discovery that the September invoice was recorded twice is a correction to existing bookkeeping.
Preserve the evidence and identify the affected entries, reports and exports before making the correction. An earlier review cannot be assumed to cover the changed result. The corrections guide explains the steps for records that have already been exported or used in a return.
DeinHans brings document processing, posting, bank reconciliation and month-end review into the same workflow. Closing the month completes that bookkeeping stage. Submission to the tax authorities and statutory financial statements remain distinct tasks.
Sources
Sources were checked on 06 October 2026. This article provides orientation and is not tax, legal, or accounting advice.
- German Fiscal Code section 146 – bookkeeping requirements
- German Commercial Code section 252 – recognition and valuation principles
- Published